Comparing a private loan to a bank loan on interest rate alone is like comparing an airline ticket to a train ticket on price alone. They are different products solving different problems, and the right question is which problem you have.
What a bank is optimised for
A conventional lender is optimised for cost of capital. It can offer a low rate because it lends against strict, standardised criteria: documented income, seasoned ownership, stabilised occupancy, a conforming property type and a borrower profile that fits a scorecard. The price of that low rate is time and rigidity. A bank file that hits a genuine exception does not get a workaround; it gets declined or re-underwritten from the start.
What a private lender is optimised for
A private lender is optimised for certainty and speed. We underwrite the property's equity and the borrower's capacity to make payments, then the exit. That means we can move on a file a bank cannot read: an entity formed for the acquisition, a property mid-renovation, a partial entitlement, a seller who will not wait 45 days. The price of that flexibility is a higher rate and a shorter term.
Key takeaways
- Compare the two on total cost over the actual holding period, not on annual rate — a 9% loan held five months can cost less than a 7% loan you did not get in time to win the property.
- A private loan is usually a bridge to conventional financing, not a replacement for it.
Doing the arithmetic properly
Suppose you are buying at $2,000,000 and you need to close in twelve days. Private financing at, say, 9% for six months plus points is a real cost, and it is knowable in advance. Set it against three things a rate comparison leaves out:
- The value of winning the deal at all. If the bank timeline means you do not close, the bank's rate is irrelevant — you own nothing.
- The cost of the alternative. An extension fee, a lost deposit, or a renegotiated price after a failed close are all real numbers.
- The holding period, not the annual rate. Private loans are short. The interest you actually pay is the rate multiplied by the months you are in it, plus points — not the rate multiplied by thirty years.
Run those and the comparison usually resolves cleanly in one direction or the other. If the deal has time and fits a bank's box, take the bank's money. If it does not, the private loan is not the expensive option — it is the only option that transacts.
The structures in between
The choice is not always binary. A construction facility that converts to a permanent low-interest loan at completion gives you private-lender speed during the build and conventional pricing afterwards, underwritten once. On multifamily, a bridge-to-stabilisation loan carries a property through a repositioning until its income can support agency or bank debt.
A short checklist
Choose private financing when: you need certainty of close on a date; the property is not yet stabilised or conforming; the borrower is an entity without the seasoning a bank wants; or the opportunity has a deadline. Choose conventional financing when: the property is stabilised, the timeline is generous, and the file fits the box.
Not sure which describes your deal? Describe it to us on the phone — (800) 943-1314 — and we will tell you honestly, including when the answer is “go to a bank.”
Published by the US Lending & Company underwriting desk. General information only — not legal, tax or investment advice. NMLS #244778 · DRE #01516868.
